Search for: "People v. McKenna" Results 221 - 240 of 253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
Major firms have laid off 6 people this month (all lawyers) 491 people this year (192 lawyers, 299 staff) 14,702 people si [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is bound up with rules v. standards. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
McKenna: it’s a statement about people who buy Louis Vuitton. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mark McKenna: The issue is people who conclude that making you think harder in any way is a search cost. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm by Tom
From medical files that I have reviewed recently it seems that once experts have identified that there are toxic substances in a particular neighborhood or environment, people come forward with a long list of complaints and medical histories alleging that the exposure caused some, most or all of the illnesses. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Colin O'Keefe
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
(I think this claim makes Mark McKenna’s point quite well: TM’s key wrong turn came when it abandoned competition. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:57 am
What about the people who make up that profession? [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
I even got comments from people that thought I was "absurd" for not listing them. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:26 am
Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm by jesse londin
First, SLP joins folks around the globe including everybody here in blogspace in congratulating CNSA and the people of China on the success of the lunar probe Chang'e I. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
Some people suggest that dilution protection reduces consumer search costs. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
Those principles having failed, we return to competition; likewise, people like Mark McKenna are starting to suggest a materiality requirement for infringement. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
To take an example from Mark McKenna, suppose the NYT runs a story truthfully saying "Nike Announces New Shoe Line," and because Nike is so good at marketing consumers assume that Nike authorized that headline. [read post]