Search for: "People v. Minor (1994)"
Results 221 - 240
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:29 am
The case, FCC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 7:50 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
Emery, and her parents Constance M. and Paul V. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
” See Ross v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
Patch v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm
Ruth V. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
And here Justice Scalia’s words, citing U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:09 pm
Bommai v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
In the '90s a million people bought that book. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
Clark, 18 F.3d 1337 (6th Cir. 1994), Jeffrey Mullins, Roger Clark, and others allegedly robbed three banks. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
Surprisingly, this issue rarely comes up in the caselaw; and in the most obvious case where it has, the AV v. iParadigms case, the court found a way to stick the minors. [read post]
