Search for: "People v. Page"
Results 221 - 240
of 8,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 1:09 am
The Justia page. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:56 am
The fact that you're also found guilty of a different murder is simply icing on the cake.And it may take the California Supreme Court 83 pages and nearly 17 years to resolve your direct appeal. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:48 am
The TAC is 730 paragraphs and 150 pages long. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
As are the things they say thereafter.Plus, I gotta say, check out pages 49 through 54 of the opinion. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
(See People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
I mention this one if only because the concurrence written by Justice Graham -- a retired judge from Marin sitting by designation -- seems particular timely in light of current events.Justice Graham writes separately solely to write three pages excoriating prior authority that uses the term "voluntary" to describe non-forced sexual interaction between a minor and an adult. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
The opinion spans over 115 pages. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
Page four reads:"Victim three agreed to sell her car to Maritza Martinez. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 11:53 am
You know what's going to happen in the next twenty pages when Justice Baxter begins this opinion by saying:"Jurors, like all human beings, are imperfect. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
The following is from Byrum v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
By contrast, Justice Mihara dissents, and writes a 27-page dissent of his own. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
I have been saying for a long time now on this page (and I am hardly alone in making this assertion) that polarization, seemingly the new normal in U.S. politics is what it fueling many of the problems facing the nation today. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:07 am
You can monitor this page for updates. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 9:21 am
At the heart of McDaniel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Most people will tend to ignore these endorsement as just more confusing paperwork. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
