Search for: "People v. Patrick" Results 221 - 240 of 989
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In a perfect world, people would be able to represent themselves and make their own choices in the legal system. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
  In practice, it makes sense to engage with experts early and to ascertain what people in the relevant scientific community were thinking and doing or not doing around the priority date of the patent under consideration. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:08 pm by Emily Galik
Oklahoma and Sharp v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
A research from Ofcom  found that as online news consumption grows people are less likely to check the facts. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  Likewise, although Graham announced that the subpoenas are necessary because "[t]he American people deserve answers to these questions" about "why all these counterintelligence investigations were opened to begin with" and "how these investigations got off the rails," a recent Office of Legal Counsel opinion insists that "transmitting information “to inform the public . . . is not a part of the legislative function. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
After almost three weeks with almost no activity, the criminal case involving the United States v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
The lawyer for Trump, Patrick Strawbridge, opens with the claim that the subpoenas at issue are “unprecedented in every sense. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
Arguing for the president, lawyer Patrick Strawbridge described the committees’ subpoenas as “unprecedented in every sense. [read post]