Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:56 am
Schutte v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:35 pm
Without making a change, workers will continue to pay the price. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
The best example is exclusionary zoning, as regulatory restrictions on housing construction price millions of lower-income people out of areas where they could otherwise find greater opportunity…. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
As Europeans, we would like to rejoice at the prospect of witnessing the EU progressing towards an “ever closer union among the peoples of Europe” with a unified patent law under a unitary title and a jurisdiction with transnational competence for patent litigation. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Columbiaknit, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
First, the numerator is individual people, while the denominator is ad impressions. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
For example, some lower-priced technologies collect more data than other technologies, such as inexpensive smartphones that come with preinstalled apps that leak data and can’t be deleted. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am
In another, a barber and a dry cleaner in Alabama won their right to offer services below a minimum price set in a New Deal-era price-fixing scheme. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:57 pm
Price, 876 F.3d 573, 579 (4th Cir. 2017). [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:48 pm
Portillo claim that at the trial, the only evidence of this fact came from nonadmissible hearsay, when the warehouse manager testified at trial that these were the prices he saw when he looked up the dumbbells online.Resulting, today, in a 45-page opinion that an evidence professor would drool over, in which Justice Feuer thinks that the testimony was admissible nonhearsay for one reason, whereas Justice Segal believes that it is admissible nonhearsay for a different reason. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
What about people like me? [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In short, they suggest that sometimes a “perfectly legal” ruse is not being invoked to evade the intent of a law—which is what, for example, people mean when they say that certain abusive tax shelters might be wrong but are technically within the meaning of a poorly written provision. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
Supreme Court refuses to consider filmmaker's appeal Price v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:21 pm
CLIENT ALERT: Price v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
The financial links across the insurance sector guarantee that pricing is less localized than one might think, and even people who are living in mostly-safe areas are not sheltered from the increase in prices. [read post]
