Search for: "People v. Simmons"
Results 221 - 240
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm
Six years ago, in Roper v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
After the government lost Simmons, Hernández was relisted again. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:28 am
“Officially, the subjective prong is still viable” in determining if a search was consensual, noted Ric Simmons, but after [the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 9:01 pm
Consider that in Zelman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm
People should not drink recalled tea. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:57 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
The remaining category of American religious-liberty controversies involves exemptions for religious exercise and accommodations for religious people. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
It’s a principal reason why people move from one town to another. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
The second case, Sullivan v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
Simmons, which struck down the death penalty for crimes committed by 16- and 17-year-olds. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 9:03 am
Simmons. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., 05-381 Justice Thomas wrote the unanimous, scholarly opinion reversing the CA9's latest misadventure into antitrust law. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
Kurtzman or Marsh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 11:04 am
That suit has dragged out over five years, writes Goldman:[T]he long-running Steinbuch v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Simmons, 379 U.S. 497 (1965). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Comer (2017) and Zelman v. [read post]
