Search for: "People v. Speaks (1981)" Results 221 - 240 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am by SHG
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the… [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:34 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 463 (1993), relevant mitigating evidence to be disregarded, see, e. g., Johnson v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm by Mike Scarcella
” Sellers was lead counsel for the female plaintiffs in the landmark gender discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Of course, Crosskey’s originalism was of no use to these people. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Donna
§ 1981(a post-Civil War race discrimination statute) prohibits retaliation. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:13 am by Kershisnik Law
According to the NHTSA, when comparing percentage of those actually found to have a BAC of greater than the legal limit from 1981 v. 1998, the accuracy of the tests due to training increased substantially. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:56 am by Adam Wagner
Generally speaking, think very carefully before posting or tweeting in relation to ongoing criminal trials (or family proceedings, for that matter). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Generally speaking, the law should make sure that people can’t profit by their own unlawful activities. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:07 am
The Oyster Case: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v. [read post]