Search for: "People v. Strong (1994)"
Results 221 - 240
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
Note that these rules don’t apply to records that courts must keep confidential by law, such as fee waiver applications (Cal Rules of Ct 3.54) and search warrant affidavits sealed under People v Hobbs (1994) 7 C4th 948, 30 CR2d 651. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
App. 2002) (same), with Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:52 pm
He also must know that our prisons are filled with people who thought if they could only tell their side of the story, a judge or jury would see it their way. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
In a 1994 study reported in Justice Quarterly, criminologists J. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
Thomas, 512 N.W.2d 777, 785 (1994); ? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
Richard Maxwell Brown’s excellent book No Duty to Retreat: Violence and Values in American History and Society (1994) details the strong trend in American courts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries against a duty of retreat. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am
This is significant, when we compare this judgment with the attitude of the English Court of Appeal in the 1994 case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Rees-Mogg. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:47 am
The Appeal The main ground of appeal was based on the common law right of access to court, established in Raymond v Honey [1983 1 AC.1, 13] and a series of pre Human Rights cases such as R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198, and R (Anufrijeva) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] 1 AC 604 at 621[26]. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Grade: B Super Bowl XXIX 1994 The sunshine connects to Miami, but the coloration looks more Phoenix. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:32 am
The contrasting post-Bilski decisions of the Federal Circuit in Ultramercial v Hulu, 657 F 3d 1323 (Fed Cir 2011) and last Friday’s decision in Dealertrack v Huber, 2009-1566, -1588 (Fed Cir 2012) show that this split is alive and well. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert In the Oracle v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:00 am
William V. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
However, in Eldred v Ashcroft“The First Amendment securely protects the freedom to make – or decline to make – one’s own speech; it bears less heavily when speakers assert the right to make other people’s speeches. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
I don’t have a strong view. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
See also City of Ladue v. [read blog]
