Search for: "Performance Construction Inc" Results 221 - 240 of 3,653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2009, 9:14 am
 The background events began when a man was injured while performing construction activities, allegedly because a piece of equipment exploded. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:56 pm
The settling defendants are: Jerry Ryce Builders, Inc. and Jerry Ryce Masonry, Inc., owned by Boguslaw Omielan and operating out of 3801 South Archer Chicago, Ill.; and J S Masonary, Inc., JS Masonry & Tuckpointing, Inc., and JS Masonry & Stone, Inc., owned by Jan Staszel and operating out of 9001 W. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:05 am
The Fifth DCA reversed, reasoning that the plain unambiguous statutory language of Section 95.11(3)(c) required the completion of performance of the contract by both parties, and not just the completion of the performance of the contractor's duties under the contract. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:29 am by Matthew DeVries
 In the world of construction contracting, both can get in you in trouble, including a termination for default of performance. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 11:07 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
  Orbital also performed extensive design and construction services for NIPSCO relating to its utility infrastructure, including fielding, designing and providing construction packages for recloser devices, commonly referred to as “Vipers. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm by Daniel E. Katz
The sponsor had hired BFC Construction, which in turn hired A-1 Testing Laboratories Inc., to provide fire proofing inspection for the building. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:17 pm by admin
PCL Construction Services, Inc., No. 09-17167 (9th Cir. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:52 am
WilnerHolding:  An award of losses in the amount of the value of time spent by principals and employees in performing litigation-related activities was proper, given an expense-shifting provision negotiated separately by sophisticated parties calling expressly for reimbursement in the event of losses.Facts:  Appellant Under Armour, Inc. [read post]