Search for: "Persons v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 221 - 240 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am by John Elwood
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-663, is yet another hold for United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm by Dave
In Castle v Commissioner of Police [2011] EWHC (Admin) 2317, the Divisional Court nuanced this approach by saying that the impact of the section 11 duty would “depend to a significant degree upon the function being performed and the circumstances in which it is being performed”. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
Available from: www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Business/Forum/Pages/2012ForumonBusinessandHumanRights.aspx Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (f) See the link of the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) to tools on business and human rights, including the publication containing the text of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide,… [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm by Colter Paulson and Trane Robinson
Commissioner of Social Security, for example, the court finding the relevant statute ambiguous deferred to the Commissioner’s reasonable interpretation. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Security Magazine had a piece “The lurking security risks of surveillance capitalism”. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Social Media The Socially Aware blog has a roundup of recent news. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
The table of contents is as follows: DIVISION A—SECOND CORONAVIRUS PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020 DIVISION B—NUTRITION WAIVERS DIVISION C—COVID–19 HEALTH CARE WORKER PROTECTION ACT OF 2020 DIVISION D—EMERGENCY PAID LEAVE ACT OF 2020 DIVISION E—EMERGENCY UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE STABILIZATION AND ACCESS ACT OF 2020 DIVISION F—PAID SICK DAYS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES AND PERSONAL AND FAMILY CARE DIVISION… [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by James Segroves
What’s this about the “Commissioner of Social Security” and claims arising under subchapter II? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
More precisely, the deputy commissioner erred by failing to consider the other factors set forth in Porter, including the circumstances of the employment that “placed the workers in close proximity, that the personal relationships originated at work, and that the knife used was an implement of the employment. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
At a time when so many communities are struggling to give meaning to the 50-year-old promise of Gideon v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Privacy International has noted the interdependence of privacy upon security as part of a post for National Cyber Security Awareness Month and has published a series of posts: a series of podcasts on cyber security, analysis of a report from the High Commissioner for Human Rights into safeguarding privacy in the digital age; and suggested frameworks for regulating cyber-crime and implementing cyber security measures whilst explaining the difference… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the case of D v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 157 (QB). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The Privacy & Information Security Law Blog has published its analysis of the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) guidelines, published 12 January 2022, on the re-use of personal data by data processors for their own purposes (such as product improvement or the development of new products and services) under the GDPR. [read post]