Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips" Results 221 - 240 of 4,210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2022, 4:43 am by INFORRM
In Flood, Lord Phillips pointed out that the question of public interest is ‘not a black and white test’ [30]. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 6:38 am by Bob Ambrogi
” Casetext’s tool returned the following statement from the case Frlekin v. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am by Cameron Kerry
In June, the Supreme Court provided appellate judges with a neutron bomb against agency regulations with its decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ex-Interior Secretary Zinke Lied to Investigators in Casino Case, Watchdog Finds MSN – Lisa Rein and Anna Phillips (Washington Post) | Published: 8/24/2022 Former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, the leading contender to win a new U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 3:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
As summarized in Phillips v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Svetlana S. Gans and Natalie Hausknecht
”   Commissioner Noah Phillips’ dissent criticized the ANPRM for failing to provide “notice of anything” and thus stripping the public of its participation rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
—Whitney Tilson _______________________________________________1Hubbell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:33 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The original complaint may be viewed here: file:///C:/Users/JNewman/Documents/Long-ex-rel-US-v-Modernizing-Medicine-Daniel-Cane-qui-tam-complaint.pdf The whistleblower is represented by Phillips and Cohen law firm. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
   Dissenting, Phillips LJ described the approach of the majority as “unprincipled,” remarking that it would be “unfortunate” if the Appellant “having been denied a fair trial in Bangladesh in 2013 … was now prevented from having access to the courts of this jurisdiction. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Burset, Notre Dame Law School, have updated their paper on Entick v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
Today’s Neo-Brandeisians may have abandoned components of Brandeis’s antitrust program—namely, his commitment to “fair trade” and his distrust of big government—perhaps placing them in closer alliance to Judge Learned Hand’s antitrust logic in U.S. v. [read post]