Search for: "Power v. Holder" Results 221 - 240 of 2,816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm by Celia Taylor
The amendments are not intended to limit a court's power to impose sanctions under applicable law or the enforceability of any charter or bylaw provision that binds any person pursuant to any separate contract. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:47 pm
The consensus policy of economists would put most of the burden of adjustment on politically powerful holders of equity and bonds. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Patricia Salkin
Dembiee v Town of Holderness, 2014 WL 5859514 (NH 11/13/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2014/2013-068.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Declaratory Relief, Enforcement, Estoppel, Ripeness [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Patricia Salkin
Dembiee v Town of Holderness, 2014 WL 5859514 (NH 11/13/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-hampshire/supreme-court/2014/2013-068.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Declaratory Relief, Enforcement, Estoppel, Ripeness [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 4:30 pm by Annemarie Bridy
Rather, an account holder must be considered an infringer, at minimum, when the service provider has actual knowledge that the account holder is using its services for infringing purposes. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 11:54 am by Brent Wieand
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court began on Tuesday in Health and Hospital Corp. v Talevski. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Robert Loeb, Emma Kohse
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm by Bruce Boyden
The quotation noted that in that case, as in UMG, the copyright owner had opted not to send any takedown notices under Section 512, which “stripped it of the most powerful evidence of a service provider’s knowledge — actual notice of infringement from the copyright holder. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
On March 31, 2010 the US Supreme Court handed down a 7-2 decision in the case of Padilla v. [read post]