Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 3,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
Most of the provisions were the same as the ones quoted above, but the new TOS added two new sections: `22. [read post]
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
— the state court made the federal sentence a logical impossibility by ordering the two state sentences to run concurrently with one another. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
§318(b) violates Article III of the United States Constitution, to the extent that it empowers an executive agency tribunal to assert judicial power canceling private property rights amongst private parties embroiled in a private federal dispute of a type known in the common law courts of 1789, rather than merely issue an advisory opinion as an adjunct to a trial court. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am by Eric Goldman
Background: State Sovereign Immunity The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:45 am by John Ellis
On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
Davenport, 637 F.3d 1095 (2010) he wrote a dissent from the denial of an en banc rehearing in a case which held that memorial crosses donated by the Utah Highway Patrol Association and placed on public property to commemorate fallen troopers violate the Establishment Clause.⇾ In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:17 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
United States: One of the two cases affirmed by an equally divided court, the decision illustrates the minimal impact Justice Elena Kagan's recusals had on the term.Honorable Mentions: Snyder v. [read post]