Search for: "Powers v. Common Council"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
The common law principles of state immunity allows foreign countries to plead state immunity, the USA could have pleaded state immunity from the outset, however in this case it failed to do so. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
[This secretive union of corporate lobbyists and political interests, and the exclusion of public participation in the drafting of legislation, is echoed in the current day activities of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)]. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
380/03 Germany v Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
It is common ground that Datalink was unable to carry on business in a commercially viable way unless its websites were in Google’s search results. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:38 pm
To date, a Department summary and the actual written comments from the November 2020 public hearing were reported to council members at the 21 January 2021 council meeting. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
On 16 April 2013 it will be back before the Commons on “ping pong”, the stage at which the Commons considers new amendments made by the House of Lords. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:34 am
Exceptionally, the GREVIO has powers to undertake urgent reports in order to prevent “serious, massive, or persistent” violations of the Convention (Article 68(13)), even with the power to undertake visits to countries (Article 68(14)). [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
The House of Commons exists because the people have elected its members. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Germany of 6 September 1978, Malone v. the United Kingdom from August 2, 1984, etc.).58. interpretative value of the preamble is deeply rooted in countries with common law system ( common law ), Preamble to the Constitution embodying a guiding framework for constitutional interpretation.59. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:45 am
Even the case caption is in question: the petitioner styles the matter Robertson v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:17 am
Globalive Wireless Management Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:17 am
Globalive Wireless Management Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm
Canada and United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
The case of Entick v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:04 am
However, all of these topics are considered in a compact (44 paragraph) recent judgment from the Privy Council (delivered by Sir David Kitchin), on appeal from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica (Pfizer Limited (Appellant) v Medimpex Jamaica Limited and another (Respondents); [2014] UKPC 20). [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
However the effect of these new rules and the impact of the high profile Giggs case certainly mean that the stage is set for super injunctions (or interdicts) becoming more common. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
As originally understood, the judicial power extended to “suit[s] at the common law, or in equity, or admiralty. [read post]
