Search for: "Powers v. Jones"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,740
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2022, 5:52 am
” Patrick Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
The state has 33 petitions pending in criminal cases asking that McGirt be overruled — so many petitions they have two petitions just involving respondents named “Jones,” and another two with respondents named “Martin. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
Vt.) in Helali v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Given the power of Big Tech Companies, their enormous financial resources, cross-jurisdictional reach and their global impact on users’ privacy, there are two main litigation challenges for successfully bringing a privacy claim against Big Tech. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
” The board—one of whose members is Amy Jones, a parent of one of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm
Mondaire Jones. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Jones 2012); the location of a cell phone (Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 3:05 pm
News Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html This week, in brief: 'An ancestral fight': Tribal members condemn death penalty following Jones' clemency As Xcel maps its “power pathway,” how close is too close to the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site? [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm
That conundrum last reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in Martinez v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:24 am
Turning first to the request by petitioners to proceed with this matter as a class action (CPLR 901), we note that when governmental operations are involved, and when subsequent petitioners will be adequately protected under the principles of stare decisis, class actions are inappropriate (Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 N.Y.2d 42). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 1:13 am
IndiaX v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:50 pm
NFIB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 8:47 pm
(Complaint, RAF, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Smith will tend to yield a higher settlement than Jones v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
Smith will tend to yield a higher settlement than Jones v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:42 pm
State v. [read post]
