Search for: "Powers v. Taylor" Results 221 - 240 of 870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2011, 5:39 am by INFORRM
Unduly to fetter their freedom to report as editors judge to be responsible is to undermine the pre-eminence of the deserved place of the press as a powerful pillar of democracy. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 5 February 2014 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Adamson & Ors v Paddico Ltd; Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham and Little Francis) v Betterment Properties Ltd; and Richardson & Anor v Director of Public Prosecutions. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
| Oprah Winfrey and OWN YOUR POWER trade mark | EPO December Administrative Council Meeting | Blurred Lines | Again on Actavis v Boehringer | Is the EU Patent Package diminishing the EU’s powers? [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
More importantly, if the president were actually to declare a national emergency—or, as Taylor suggests, point to a previously-declared emergency—and invoke either or both statutes, he would not actually gain all that much new power. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm by Ken Lammers
Be advised, trial judges, that anything outside of that is not allowed per Taylor v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:37 pm
Taylor Machine Works, 179 Ill. 2d 367, 689 N.E. 2d 1057 (1997). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Lente, 759 F.3d 1149 (10th Cir. 2014) (affirming Indian country criminal sentence) WildEarth Guardians v EPA, 759 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2014) (rejecting challenge to federal implementation plan for tribally owned power plant) Greene v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
The Founders Set an Extremely High Bar for Impeachment By Margaret Taylor, Fellow in Governance Studies, Brookings Institution and Senior Editor and Counsel, Lawfare Margaret Taylor writes that a very high bar for impeachment is good because if it were lower Congress would hold too much power over the president and there would be too much instability in the government. [read post]