Search for: "Price v. Allen" Results 221 - 240 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2015, 9:34 am by Michael Lowe
Read the Opinion Of The Texas Board Of Disciplinary Appeals Appointed By The Supreme Court Of Texas in Case No. 55649, styled William Allen Schultz, Appellant v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
Finally, for a further look into last week’s main legal news, why not check out Charon QC three-part news roundup here, here and here, or David Allen Green’s roundup at The Lawyer? [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Amazon has a new low-price health service called Amazon Clinic, where for as little as $30, patient-customers can consult with a clinician online from an Amazon partner, who can issue prescriptions. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
LEXIS 23 (Az 6/16/2010) “Even when viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, the evidence suggests that Price’s final shot “came in an attempt . . . [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The owners of the deposits did not seek to exploit the deposits for years, but when the price of uranium spiked during the mid-2000s, they sued to challenge the commonwealth’s mining moratorium. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Beaver, No. 07-1381 "Convictions for participating in a price-fixing conspiracy, and making false statements to a federal law enforcement agent who was investigating that conspiracy, are affirmed over defendant's claims that the government failed to prove at trial that a price-fixing conspiracy existed, that he joined the conspiracy, or that he made false statements. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
Booking and price information can be found here. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Price, No. 07-40040 A sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm is vacated and remanded where the district court plainly erred in assigning a base offense level of 24 under U.S.S.G. 2K2.1(a)(2) because one of defendant's prior drug convictions could have been merely for an offer to sell under section 481.112 of the Texas Health and Safety Code. [read post]