Search for: "Price v. King*"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2022, 2:26 pm
Supreme Court (in Ohio v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:37 am
The case is Medieval Times USA, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:29 am
It is the PBS listing of the first generic that usually triggers a statutory reduction in the government subsidised price for prescription medicines so the Commonwealth’s claim hinged on this causative link. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
W & J Harlan Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
How do you put a price on pain and suffering? [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
Mistakes can happen, but there’s usually a price. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
" in other words, because there are so many participants in national stock markets, and those participants have such a voracious appetite for information, then anything about a particular stock is essentially instantaneously reflected in that stock’s price. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 10:54 am
Supreme Court in Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Goddamn v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
The background to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
This post summarises the issues of drug prices and access to medicines, which received the most comments from readers of the previous posts. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
Also, consider Brownmark v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” At Rewire.News, Imani Gandy explores the implications for the cases of a 1989 case, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:43 am
Accolade came out wrong because allowing fair use for an unlicensed game undermined the discount pricing for game consoles, but thought Whelan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
(picture, right - the AmeriKat after her weekday morning shampoo) L'Anza sold its products domestically and internationally, but its prices to foreign distributors were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am
The Court’s reasoning It was clear from the authorities (Abnett v British Airways Plc [1997] A.C. 430 and Barclay v British Airways Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1419) that the Montreal Convention had exclusivity in domestic law. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:42 pm
Wampole & Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 4:25 am
" A 1988 Brooklyn larceny case involving the theft of a television, People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
(See Smiley v. [read post]
