Search for: "Price v. State of Illinois" Results 221 - 240 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 10:40 am by Jeremy T. Rosenblum and James Kim
The complaint states: “At most, ordinary application of state law to non-banks could reduce the price that non-bank purchasers might be willing to pay national banks for their loans. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Illinois: Court Rejects Admission of New General Partner in Violation of Limited Partnership Agreement The Illinois Appellate Court’s recent decision in Schwartz v Schwartz (read here) is yet another example of cases turning on the interpretation of a governing ownership agreement — in this case, a limited partnership agreement — and, more specifically, of what can happen when the drafters leave what seem like foreseeable gaps in the… [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:13 pm
DVSS brought a motion in the district court to dismiss Bamberg's claims on the grounds that, because Bamberg did not obtain its products directly from J & J, it lacked standing to pursue antitrust claims based on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am by Amy A. Breyer
She founded the Chicago Bar Association’s animal law committee in 2003 and the Illinois State Bar Association’s animal law section in 2009. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of KansasOpinion Date: 9/17/09Cite: Oldham Graphic Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by David Spence
In Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 10:15 pm
  It's a high price to pay for a legal fiction.The answer seems to be found in the most basic aspect of Rivera v. [read post]