Search for: "Price v. Taylor"
Results 221 - 240
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 The Court reversed its prior position on this matter taken under Chief Justice Taylor. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Judge Norman Robison ruled that State Engineer Tracy Taylor “abused his discretion” and “acted arbitrarily, capriciously and oppressively” when he cleared the authority to pump more than 6 billion gallons of groundwater a year from Cave, Delamar and Dry Lake valleys. . [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:32 am
The Michigan Supreme Court will hear oral argument this afternoon in Davis v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
KITCHEN CAPTAIN HAINES ET AL.; from Taylor County;11th district (11? [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
California: The Modern Woman's Divorce Guide by Helene Taylor, Esq. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:48 pm
Burlage v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
Taylor, 295 F. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
" The material presented includes the following [The General Index of Topics and samples from the text are set out below for your review]: General Index of Topics Table of Cases IntroductionAn outline of issues and concerns relevant toSituations involving Sections 207-a and 207-c of theGeneral Municipal LawGeneral Outline Of Cases And Related MaterialsConcerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a,Section 207-c and related lawsThe Full Text of Selected Opinions Selected provisions of law:… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 8:38 pm
… In Butler v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Weideman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Taylor applied Ohio law.Kent v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Taylor, D. [read post]
