Search for: "Prior v. Department of Revenue" Results 221 - 240 of 837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 9:30 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
* The Department of Justice’s brief opposing the settlement is currently due on September 18, 2009. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am by WSLL
Dep’t of Revenue; Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
In fact, the cost of meeting the agency’s demands would greatly exceed the revenue generated from Google’s government contract, the ALJ noted (OFCCP v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:46 pm by vforberger
TetraTech The Department of Justice’s newly-created solicitor general’s office represents both the Department of Revenue and the Department of Workforce Development in these cases. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Fourth Department States That Federal Poverty Income Guidelines Do Not Apply Where Income Is Imputed in Excess of Guidelines Amount In Niagra County Department of Social Services ex rel Hueber v Hueber, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5433691 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.) the Support Magistrate imputed income to Respondent based on the minimum wage for a period of over three years and ordered that he pay child support arrears for that period of $1,870.68. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
Finally, the judge took up Taha’s claim for “false light,” a concept I’ve discussed in prior posts. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by John Baker
It will be interesting to see how much of the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:44 pm by James Hamilton
” He had taken a job as a consultant to a law firm, during his leave of absence.Also during his leave of absence, the employee filed a complaint with the Labor Department alleging that the company violated Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley by retaliating against him after he alerted the SEC and the audit committee to concerns about GAAP violations with respect to revenue recognition and joint venture accounting practices. [read post]