Search for: "Protective Committee v. Anderson" Results 221 - 237 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT CLEAR CREEK VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS' RIGHTS AND PRESERVE OUR PARK; from Galveston County; 14th district (14-05-01143-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)[Substituted separate opinion in 14-05-01143-CV]Petitions Denied June 20, 200808-0091 RONALD PUGH AND BETTY PUGH v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
Similarly, the petition in Anderson v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
West (07-663) from the January 18 conference, and Anderson v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Intellectual Property Watch), Open licensing vs monopoly controlled supply: (KEI), Protecting inventions involving biofuel feedstock: (IP Law360), Brazil: ‘Public interest’ factor in Brazil’s patenting system: (Spicy IP), EU: Regulation (EC) 1394/2007 on advanced medicinal products to enter into force soon, creating certification procedure regarding quality and non-clinical data: (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
,INTA roundtable on ‘Internet domain names: A trademark practitioner’s point of view’ - Manhattan, 14 April: (The Trademark Blog),INTA trade mark conference, Sydney: OHIM President offers to host roundtable to cut red tape facing businesses attempting to obtain worldwide IP protection: (IPwar’s)Domain tasting: why are IP owners silent? [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
  By doing so, SOX specifically addresses conflicts that arise when one professional entity performs work for a client but also owes fiduciary duties to the investing public and company shareholders. [28] SOX intimidated KPMG into disbanding their global legal entity, KLegal, which employed mover than 3,000 lawyers in 60 countries. [29]  However, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte & Touche, and Ernst & Young have no intentions of doing the same, despite added… [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Tennessee: UCP of Middle Tennessee 1200 9th Avenue North, Suite 110 Nashville, TN 37208 Phone: (615) 242-4091 Fax: (615) 242-3582 E-mail: info@ucpnashville.org Web: http://www.ucpnashville.org UCP of the Mid-South 4189 Leroy Memphis, TN 38108 Phone: (901) 761-4277 Fax: (901) 761-7876 E-mail: ucp@ucpmemphis.org Web: http://www.ucpmemphis.org TENNESSEE STATE RESOURCES AGING Tennessee Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 500 Interstate… [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:36 am
Box 68 Isle of Palms, SC 29451 Phone: (843) 553-3725 Fax: (843) 792-1593 E-mail: pilchees@musc.edu Down Synrome Family Alliance of Greenville 1021 Hudson Road Greenville, SC 29615 Phone: (864) 294-4667 Web: http://www.downsnet.com/dsfag Easter Seals Easter Seals South Carolina -State Headquarters 3020 Farrow Road Columbia, SC 29203-7099 Phone: (803) 256-0735 Web: http://www.sc.easter-seals.org Easter Seals South Carolina -Anderson County 1104 Ella Street Anderson, SC … [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 7:48 am
Box 308 Yorktown, IN 47396 Phone: (800) 589-1121 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.area6.org Bureau of Aging and In-Home Services 402 West Washington Street, E-431 Indianapolis, IN 46207 Phone: (317) 232-7020; (800) 352-4800 (Toll Free) Fax: (317) 233-3475 Web: http://www.state.in.us/fssa/elderly/aging/index.html AARP Indiana One North Capitol Avenue, Suite 1275 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2025 Phone: (317) 423-2277 Fax: (317) 423-2211 or 2299 E-mail: inaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgstates/in … [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
To address these concerns, Family Voices sends health information to more than 200 families, serves on the Medicaid Quality Improvement Committee, and works closely with the ICC, Title V/CSHCN, parent and mental health groups, and other child and disability advocacy organizations. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
Courts have concluded that all employees, and not just individuals with qualifying disabilities, are entitled to this ADA protection. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
The 1999 Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which considered allegations that NATO forces breached the proportionality rule in the Kosovo war, summarized the difficulties even under the law today:"The main problem with the principle of proportionality is not whether or not it exists but what it means and how it is to be applied. [read post]