Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Indian Child Welfare Act) United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:58 am
” Tampa Electric Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
NYPPL's public personnel law handbook focusing on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an officer or an employee in the public service of the State of New York and its political subdivisions in instances where the individual has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
NYPPL's public personnel law handbook focusing on determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty to be imposed on an officer or an employee in the public service of the State of New York and its political subdivisions in instances where the individual has been found guilty of misconduct or incompetence. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
See Ben Ezra, Weinstein, & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
” Paze is a few months away from broader public and merchant implementation. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:38 am
” A 60-day public comment period starts following publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 2:28 pm
’ He also stated ‘that Aftermath overbilled for its services. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
In McElligott v McElligott, 2023 WL 6923493, NOT FOR PUBLICATION, (D. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Illinois requires anyone who wants to provide cable or video service to get permission from state or local authorities, and pay a fee, as a condition of using public rights of way. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:05 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
Co., 261 F. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Bancorp Mortgage Co. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]
