Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 221 - 240 of 4,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 2:53 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2009] EWHC 1152 (QB) (22 May 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:57 am by tracey
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Dell’olio v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWHC 3472 (QB) (20 December 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:10 pm by Ruthann Robson
That's the question a UK judge answered largely in the negative, although making some accomodations in his opinion in Queen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:06 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: The High Court decision in Pell v The Queen continues... [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:17 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Spencer v S Franses Ltd [2011] EWHC 1269 (QB) (20 May 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:18 am by tracey
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lawlor v Sandvik Mining & Construction Mobile Crushers and Screens Ltd [2012] EWHC 1188 (QB) (15 May 2012) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:28 am by sally
Regina (Public and Commercial Services Union) v Minister for the Civil Service Queen’s Bench Division “The consent of members of the Civil Service Compensation Scheme was required before valid changes could be made which deprived them of rights which had accrued in respect of redundancy and compulsory early retirement. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:35 am
Regina (Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council Queen’s Bench Division “Statutory provisions entitling interested persons to inspect and copy accounts of a local authority and all books, deeds, contracts, bills, vouchers and receipts relating to them, were to be given a broad interpretation in respect of the phrases, ‘accounts to be audited’ and ‘relating to’. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 am
Regina (B) v Director of Public Prosecutions, Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening Queen’s Bench Division “The decision to abandon a prosecution because of the victim's mental instability was irrational and a violation of the victim's right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment protected by article 3 of the European Convention on Human [...] [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:53 am
Regina (Prudential plc and Another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax Queen's Bench Division "Rather than apply legal advice privilege to a wider range of professionals than lawyers, its application to advice given by lawyers should be restricted, on a review of the policy and the public-interest considerations that underlay legal professional privilege. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Full disclosure was required in any judicial review proceedings involving disputed questions of fact so that effective and proper cross-examination of the makers of witness statements on those questions could take place. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
Regina (Corner House Research and Another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The rule of law required that an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office into bribery and corruption should be discontinued only by the independent judgment of the director of that office and not in response to a threat by a foreign power. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
Regina (Sovio Wines Ltd) v Food Standards Agency and Another Queen’s Bench “A grape product could be made subject to a movement control notice preventing its distribution if it had been labelled as wine but had been produced using an alcohol reduction technology that was not approved by the European Union. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:35 am
Ramblers' Association v Coventry City Council Queen’s Bench Division “A council could order the closure of a footpath under section 129A to G of the Highways Act 1980, as inserted by section 2 of the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005, only if satisfied that the footpath had facilitated prolonged criminal or antisocial behaviour at the date of the order. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 The complaint (full text) in Queens College Students For Life v. [read post]