Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:51 am
The language used by Congress in Section 702 directs the FISC to satisfy itself that these targeting, minimization, and querying procedures are “consistent with [Section 702] and with the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:35 pm
Back in August 2012, we reported on how the American Civil Liberties Union was compelling the FBI to fully disclose how it interprets the results of the United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
(Here is audio of the September 9 argument in that campaign spending case, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:00 am
From Salon: ACLU v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
The United Kingdom currently permits whole life sentences but after the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Vinter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
It sought judicial permission to obtain, by means of pen registers and trap and trace devices, vast swaths of internet metadata within the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:11 pm
Katz Technology Licensing LP (“Katz”) appeals from final judgments entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in a group of consolidated cases. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
" Kimble v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
Part II focuses on the new CIA guidelines and their treatment of publicly available information and related issues, including bulk collection, querying, retention and dissemination, and undisclosed participation in organizations inside the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The Section 215 telephony-metadata program serves the paramount government interest in preventing and disrupting terrorist attacks on the United States, a compelling special governmental need. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The behavior of the United States government in this case is not one of them. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
The 1981 Supreme Court decision, Rostker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:47 am
How much of this targeting appears to come from countries which have an MLAT with the United States? [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:51 am
Deauville, LLC v. [read post]
