Search for: "RANDALL v. STATE" Results 221 - 240 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by Amy Howe
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 7:33 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Need for a hearing The pro se appellant, Paul Randall Brooks, Jr., was originally convicted on January 13, 2005, by a Prince George’s County jury, presided over by Judge William D. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Texas, in which the Court will consider whether the state used the correct standard to determine whether death-row inmate Bobby James Moore is too intellectually disabled to be executed, as well as the grant in Buck v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:20 am
Echoing this view, Delaware Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III commented in Merion Capital v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Randall Eliason analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Ocasio v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:42 am by Amy Howe
” In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage looks ahead to United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 12:02 pm by Rosemary Campagna
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Fisher v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
State policy required the University to “[v]erify” Oyama’s “ability to function effectively in Department classrooms” before approving his student teaching application. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court agrees to review CRST Vans Expedited v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am by Amy Howe
” At the NCSL Blog, Lisa Soronen analyzes the recent summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]