Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD" Results 221 - 240 of 71,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
As there has been much talk about the validity of the jury instructions in  Capital Records v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:12 am by sally
Pink Floyd Music Ltd and another v EMI Records Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1429; [2010] WLR (D) 329 “The Court of Appeal should not depart from the general rule that litigation was to be conducted in public unless a judge of that court was persuaded that there were cogent grounds for doing so. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 11:18 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Beardmore v Lancashire County Council (County Court at Liverpool, 1/2/19), His Honour Judge Graham Wood QC allowed the claimant to recover medical agency fees incurred in obtaining medical records in an EL/PL Portal claim despite the fact there is no express allowance for this in the CPR, unlike the RTA Portal rules. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm by Charles Rubin
 The DCA ultimately determined that: It is not reasonable to require a defrauded creditor to monitor the land records in all 67 couties or, indeed, outside the state, as well, as a routine practice.Desak v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:44 pm by Charles Rubin
 The DCA ultimately determined that: It is not reasonable to require a defrauded creditor to monitor the land records in all 67 couties or, indeed, outside the state, as well, as a routine practice.Desak v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:36 am by lpbncontracts
The band Pink Floyd has taken its record label, EMI, to court, as reported here in the Financial Times. [read post]