Search for: "Railway Company v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
HolderDocket: 09-1211Issue(s): (1) Whether Section 304(b) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act is inapplicable to pre-enactment convictions of all immigrants whose convictions predate IIRIRA’s enactment, or whether the section’s retroactivity instead (a) turns on an immigrant’s subjective reliance; (b) turns on objectively reasonable reliance; or (c) is categorically inapplicable to convictions obtained at trial; and (2) whether the presumption against… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
It may be right to say that the Arbitration Mechanism is useful for the high-profile litigants, companies or where the stakes are very high. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:51 am by Durga Rao
It may be right to say that the Arbitration Mechanism is useful for the high-profile litigants, companies or where the stakes are very high. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Another factor that at least potentially could encourage these trends is legal developments in the United States, particularly the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:42 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiffs were a class of local property owners who filed a complaint in Wisconsin state court against Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am by Ashby Jones
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]