Search for: "Read v. Britain" Results 221 - 240 of 577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 8:27 am by Savanna Nolan
 Initially, some U.S. courts borrowed Britain’s Hicklin Test for defining obscenity, which called for “judging obscenity by the effect of isolated passages upon the most susceptible persons” (Roth v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 4:29 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Anna Bond, Lexology: Professor’s ‘anti-Zionist’ beliefs were protected: on Dr David Miller v University of Bristol [2024] ET 1400780/2022: we noted the case here. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Implementation House of Commons readings took place on 11 and 17 November 2020. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am by shirley
This was the case in Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd 1916 2 AC 307. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
Sally Bercow v EyeSpyMP, or An interesting dimension the BBC missed. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm by John Bellinger
   Justice Sotomayor seemed attracted in oral argument to the idea that the plaintiffs had not exhausted their potential remedies in Nigeria (where the alleged torts occured) or in Britain or the Netherlands (Shell is an Anglo-Dutch company) before suing in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  This concerned a story about a Manchester United footballer and was read after the “Sun” had made an offer of amends. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
  In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944  it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am by William B. Gould IV
I count that period as a formative and creative period due to voracious reading, attendance at lectures throughout London and Britain and Europe. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Lidl Great Britain v Tesco Stores [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch) and [2023] EWHC 1517 (Ch) (April, June 2023)This spring/summer blockbuster stretches to 317 paragraphs in its main judgment plus another 50 in the form of order judgment. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am by Charon QC
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]