Search for: "Read v. People"
Results 221 - 240
of 23,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
(Justice Moreno's brief concurrence on this point is worth reading, by the way.) [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
When you read old cases -- and I mean, really old cases, like from the early 1800s -- you're often struck by how oddness of the reasoning. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:50 pm
This is amongst the plethora of reasons why it's so nice to read an opinion by Justice Bedsworth. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:45 am
I always like reading opinions that help me be a more successful criminal. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:50 pm
A fine way to get over the shortened mid-week hump.P.S. - Just so you know I actually read this stuff. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
(People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:53 pm
(The text reads: 'U with me, 1 night, $200 or more.' Romantic, eh?) [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
I read a lot of cases. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 11:06 am
But just based upon reading the Court of Appeal's opinion, are you really sure the defendant's in fact guilty? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:30 pm
Yesterday I noted that the California Court of Appeal had amended a plethora of its opinions that day, and slightly complimented them for doing so -- or, at least, for being willing to amend.Today, apparently emboldened, read -- in its entirety -- the following amendment by Justice Rubin:"GOOD CAUSE appearing the opinion filed in the above entitled matter on April 9, 2007, is modified as follows:On page 3, the amount of '$17,958.13' in the first full sentence shall be… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
Some people are happy with short, concise opinions that read (to me) more as advocacy summaries than as opinions; others take a contrary view. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:49 pm
Except, apparently, for Red River Innovations LLC, a patent troll that believes its patents cover the idea of suggesting what people should read next. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
At least for some people. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
I read Justice Gorsuch's decision as broader in some respects than some may hope it is. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:06 pm
So a sleepy Hump Day.Which gives me the opportunity to go back and write, if only briefly, about a very good opinion I read a couple of weeks ago.I really, really like this opinion by Justice Elia. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 4:40 pm
This is why I love reading the California Appellate Reporter. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
D Borough Council v AB [2011] EWHC 101 (COP) (28 January 2011) – Read judgment In a case which is fascinating both legally and morally, a judge in the Court of Protection has ruled that a 41-year-old man with a mild learning disability did not have the mental capacity to consent to sex and should be prevented by a local council from doing so. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:36 am
It reads: "The trial court allowed Vanessa, age seven at time of trial, to testify over a two-way, closed-circuit TV. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 10:44 am
You can read the rest of the opinion if you'd like. [read post]
