Search for: "Read v. Turner" Results 221 - 240 of 579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
[You might also read my first post on the subject, Anti-Libel Injunctions and the Criminal Libel Connection; or you can read the whole article in PDF. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
More importantly perhaps for the purposes of the statutory definition of the conduct of litigation, Mr Turner has filled in the form in such a way that (on my reading of the rules) he has entered the Claimants name(s) on the form, thereby applying their signature to it. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the statute does not limit recovery only to the offending attorney’s client (see Fields v Turner, 1Misc2d 679, 680-681 [Sup Ct, NY County 1955]), “[t]he ‘party’ referred to is clearly a party to an action pending in a court in reference to which the deceit is practiced, and not a person outside, not connected with the same at the time or with the court” (Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481, 483 [2d Dept 1996], quoting Looff… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court decision in 1987 that supplanted the longstanding strict scrutiny basis for review with a “legitimate penological interest”-test, Turner v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:23 pm by Ezra Rosser
This proposal builds upon the Supreme Court’s recent holding in Turner v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 7:45 am by Jim Singer
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the retainer agreement utterly refutes the plaintiffs’ contention with respect to the scope of the CMM defendants’ representation in that regard (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850), and the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the fourth and fifth causes of action. [read post]