Search for: "Redding v. Christian"
Results 221 - 240
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 5:16 am
In Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:36 pm
At long last, here is a pdf link to the decision, and here is the Second Circuit Court of Appeals summary in a nutshell: “We conclude that the District Court’s holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:07 pm
Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
California - The Second Circuit on Wednesday ruled that French high fashion shoemaker Christian Louboutin is entitled to trademark protection for the iconic red soles on its shoes, dealing a blow to competing fashion house Yves Saint Laurent in its bid to outfox Louboutin's infringement claims. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:29 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:11 pm
Vitale and Abington School District v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 7:39 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:21 am
Over at DuetsBlog, we have been anxiously awaiting the Second Circuit’s decision in Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:58 am
Spot the difference: Christian Louboutin v Zara The fashionistas out there will recall that Louboutin claims to have come up with the idea for his red-soled heels some 20 years ago when he painted red nail polish on the black soles of a pair of women's shoes [Merpel wonders whether anyone was wearing them at the time -- now, that would have made an interesting story!]. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:18 am
” US v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:22 am
Whoops, caught red handed! [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 pm
One could understand why, say, Christian Louboutin might be worried that someone who sees a woman fall and shatter her ankle when the heel breaks off her red-soled stiletto pump might blame his fashion house for shoddy workmanship and decide never to purchase his shoes again. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:19 pm
When I snapped this photo over a month ago in Las Vegas, I figured it wouldn’t be much longer before we hear from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the Christian Louboutin v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:50 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York, in its August 10, 2011 decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
Attorney Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
In yesterday’s case (Lim v. [read post]
