Search for: "Ricci v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 264
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2009, 7:26 pm
Joseph Ricci, NSSTA's new Executive Director, summarized improvements in NSSTA governance. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
On FindLaw today, I have a column that considers Ricci v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Ricci v DeStefano, United State Supreme Court, Docket Nos. 07-1428 and 08-328New York State's Constitution mandates that "appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive" [Article V, Section 6].*… [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
The experience of writing and filing a brief in Ricci v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
In his column, Milbank pokes fun at the Supreme Court justices hearing the oral arguments of Ricci v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
On April 22, the Court heard an extended — over seventy minutes long - argument in Ricci v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VII (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)o o SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
  Finally, for the reasons stated above, and as shown by its legislative history, § 2000e-2(l) prohibits the City’s action. ... [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
This morning, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:19 pm
Deborah HellmanTomorrow the Supreme Court hears arguments in Ricci v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VII (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)Ø SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
DeStefano (07-1428) and Ricci v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]