Search for: "Richter v Richter" Results 221 - 240 of 606
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The Federal Circuit also held that the defendants were entitled to sanctions in the form of appellate attorney fees and double costs, against both the complaining individual and his legal counsel (Pirri v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
Richter v.City of Omaha, __ N.W.2d __, 2007WL865842 at *4 (Neb. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm by Nicole D. Prysby
” These declarations alleged only “possible future injury” and failed to establish a substantial risk of harm (Association for Accessible Medicines v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Richter (photo right), writing for a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Raharney Capital, LLC v Capital Stack LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01425 [1st Dept Feb. 25, 2016], the court abandoned its contrary 1994 ruling in Matter of Hospital Diagnostic Equipment Corp. and, realigning itself with decisions by the Brooklyn-based Second Department and Albany-based Third Department, held that New York courts lack… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Richter (photo right), writing for a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Raharney Capital, LLC v Capital Stack LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01425 [1st Dept Feb. 25, 2016], the court abandoned its contrary 1994 ruling in Matter of Hospital Diagnostic Equipment Corp. and, realigning itself with decisions by the Brooklyn-based Second Department and Albany-based Third Department, held that New York courts lack… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:19 am by Peter Mahler
Richter (photo right), writing for a unanimous panel of the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, in Matter of Raharney Capital, LLC v Capital Stack LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 01425 [1st Dept Feb. 25, 2016], the court abandoned its contrary 1994 ruling in Matter of Hospital Diagnostic Equipment Corp. and, realigning itself with decisions by the Brooklyn-based Second Department and Albany-based Third Department, held that New York courts lack… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Schindler v Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP ; 2011 NY Slip Op 31519(U); June 6, 2011 ;Supreme Court, New York County; Docket Number: 115967/2010; Judge: Judith J. [read post]