Search for: "Robert v. Department of Insurance" Results 221 - 240 of 696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 5:46 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As Chief Justice Roberts explained in NFIB, the "only consequence" of failing to obtain qualifying health insurance under the ACA as enacted was paying a tax. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:55 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It would be a shame if something happens to it,” are not a crime when spoken by an insurance salesman trying to sell a homeowner’s insurance policy. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Such benefits shall be paid to electing employees or their beneficiaries by the designated insurer or insurers in accordance with the terms of their contracts.Education Law Title 1, Article 3, Part V, §186, with respect to employees of the State Department of Education, provides as follows: §186. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Robert Liles
Approximately 61% of private insurance plans that participate in the federal employee health benefits program (FEHBP) cover chiropractic services. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court held unanimously in Cyan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a post at the time, on February 20, 2018, the SEC issued its guidance for cybersecurity-related disclosures. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm by Kathy Kapusta
Notably, Chief Justice Roberts joined the liberal wing of the court in the majority opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg; Justice Gorsuch dissented (Artis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Consider the December, 2017 decision of the Appellate Division, Third Department, in Rouis v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]