Search for: "Roberts, Board v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 2,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 4:05 am
Eligibility for "Jarema Credit" depends on the tenure area of the earlier held tenured employmentAppeal of Julia Zalaman from action of the Board of Education of the Katonah-Lewisboro Union Free School District and Superintendent Robert J. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Board of Education (1954)—but it took the Supreme Court half a generation to recognize such a right, in Loving v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
EPA and Environmental Defense v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrim­ination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state ac­tion to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:40 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuehne & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 34 (26 January 2012) Mugweni v NHS London [2011] EWCA Civ 20 (26 January 2012) AA (Iraq), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 23 (24 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Rehman v Brady, The Estate of & Anor [2012] EWHC 78 (QB) (25 January 2012) Bennett v Stephens & Anor [2012]… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm by Chris Attig
The Court stated in its supplemental briefing order that it “…has a statutory duty to consider whether any Board error was prejudicial. 38 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Neither the state nor the department shall be a party to any contract continued in whole or in part with contributions made under the education department optional retirement program established and administered pursuant to this part V of this article. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:32 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Those separate roles were then combined by PTO regulation which states “The Board institutes the trial on behalf of the Director. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:22 am by James Bickford
  This morning, the editorial boards of the Los Angeles Times and the New York Times both comment on the Court’s grant of certiorari in Ashcroft v. al-Kidd. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 3:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiff Robert Gregory intended to build upon his property, which was governed by a restrictive covenant that protects his neighbors’ views of Oyster Bay. [read post]