Search for: "Rodgers v State" Results 221 - 240 of 336
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2022, 9:14 pm by Ben Allen
 § 851, however, continues, as shown in the Sixth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
This week there are three linked appeals to be heard in the Supreme Court from Monday 14 March to Thursday 17 March 2011 by Lords Phillips, Hope and Rodger, Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Brown and Dyson: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba  v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm by INFORRM
Lord Rodger thought otherwise: ‘Doubtless, some may indeed draw the unjustified inference that M fears. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
Rodgers, 12-382, back for its sixth relist. [read post]
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
” Notably, Lord Rodger was looking at the legislation itself when seeking to draw the line, rather than its broader policy. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Angus McCullough QC
Gay rights and asylum HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 - read our post The SC held that the government? [read post]