Search for: "Ronald Morale"
Results 221 - 240
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
But however one thinks otherwise about utilitarianism's adequacy as a moral theory (given all the standard challenges and conundra it raises), I would say that is not really the best response to this particular problem. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Professor Cheng seeks to reconcile such a view, inspired by Ronald Dworkin in part, with what he calls “legalism,” the importance of international judges carefully and faithfully applying the relevant legal material in order to solve a dispute. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 8:55 am
The second half of the article develops the possibility that while some of Ronald Dworkin’s work furthered the Cardozoan project of developing American Natural Law Theory (although not under that name), the replacement of Cardozoan judicial humility by Herculean moral arrogance was a turn in the wrong direction. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 2:00 pm
The status itself is conditional on maintaining "good moral character," a clean criminal record, and other good immigrant behavior... [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
Chernow’s book follows closely on the heels of a similarly weighty biography by Ronald C. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:49 pm
Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace, by Ronald J. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:58 am
By Mike Dorf Some years ago, Ronald Dworkin reported in the New York Review of Books that he was surprised when he was permitted, on a trip to China, to speak freely about such matters as human rights. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:18 am
Ronald S. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
Here is the abstract: Ronald Dworkin famously introduces the idealized judge, Hercules, to demonstrate how to identify one right answer for any legal problem. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
In 1994-95, I was a research fellow at Princeton University’s Center for Human Values and witnessed the now famous exchange between Ronald Dworkin and Justice Antonin Scalia on constitutional interpretation. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
” Repealing a thousand vague and over-reaching laws and replacing them with laws that are cast narrowly to punish morally reprehensible conduct and give fair notice as to what is criminal may not solve the problem altogether, but it would be a good start. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
The author of the New York Times book review praising Nawaz’ book is, Irshad Manji, founder of the MoralCourage Project. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:40 pm
Since the appearance in 1967 of "The Model of Rules I," Ronald Dworkin's seminal critique of H.L.A. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:12 am
Since the appearance in 1967 of "The Model of Rules I," Ronald Dworkin's seminal critique of H.L.A. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:07 pm
For example, there are huge differences between John Hart Ely's "representation-reinforcement" theory, David Strauss' "common law constitutionalism," Ronald Dworkin's moral approach to constitutional interpretation, and Bruce Ackerman's theory of "constitutional moments. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:07 pm
For example, there are huge differences between John Hart Ely's "representation-reinforcement" theory, David Strauss' "common law constitutionalism," Ronald Dworkin's moral approach to constitutional interpretation, and Bruce Ackerman's theory of "constitutional moments. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:49 pm
” Accordingly, pragmatic, economic, and other non-moral considerations are of either no moment or no great moment when measured against “moral” imperatives. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:43 am
Miklos raised the objection that saying someone's conduct was "morally wrong" was a subjective standard, that everyone's definition of morality may be different. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:43 pm
This adversary came first with Lon Fuller’s “Positivism and Fidelity to Law”, a rebuttal to Hart’s essay “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals” (both 1958), and then with a series of essays by Ronald Dworkin published successively as Taking Rights Seriously (1977) and Law’s Empire (1986). [read post]
