Search for: "Root v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2009, 10:33 am
At that point Easterbrook noted that the Ninth Circuit, quoting Washington v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court recently held in Timbs v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
Really hard to figure out who to root for. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Virginia, and United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:54 am
The guidance describes five “essential components” of an effective sanctions compliance program: (i) management commitment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) internal controls, (iv) testing and audit, and (v) training. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
and mens rea (did Twitter have a culpable mental state?) [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
Here is the abstract: In 1945, the Supreme Court blessed a lesser known type of agency deference in Bowles v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 3:58 pm
The United States Court of Federal Claims has dismissed a complaint filed by Kellogg Brown & Root [KBR] demanding reimbursement from the US Government for claims arising out of exposures to toxic substances. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:57 pm
Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:30 am
The court will hear Timbs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 6:17 pm
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. and Amara v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:30 am
Under state law, the child would stay with the parents, but the federal law "calls for special procedures rooted in the sovereignty of Indian nations and a history of abusive child welfare practices involving Indian children." [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 8:20 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the main opinion for the Court in Timbs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:52 pm
Cavitt and United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
It's tough to figure out who to root for when Paris Hilton sues Hallmark Cards.Does Paris Hilton get money for Hallmark putting her face and catchphrase ("It's hot") on a birthday card mimicking "The Simple Life"? [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
In addition to Before Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:35 am
The cross is now displayed in a glass case along with a plaque explaining the state school's Anglican roots. [read post]
