Search for: "S. Warner"
Results 221 - 240
of 6,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
After JL resigned, Time Warner demanded that any dispute with Verizon be resolved by a date certain, and when that deadline was missed, Time Warner’s employment offer was withdrawn.Given that no “wrongful means” was utilized to interfere with JL’s business relationship, and in the absence of any “malice,” or “frivolous” conduct, the AD1 thought that Verizon’s motion should have been granted and ended… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:59 pm
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., with the Court vacating and remanding the District Court's claim construction for failure to consider extrinsic evidence. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
” Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Kronk Warner PDF Second-Generation Source of Income Housing DiscriminationArmen H. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The group seek a judicial review of NHS England’s decision, arguing that it has no legal basis for doing so. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Senate contests like Sherrod Brown’s in Ohio and Jon Tester’s in Montana. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 11:31 am
It was the second time in six months that Downloader was suspended based on a complaint that the app's web browser is capable of loading websites. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:59 pm
Advertising industry insiders told the Financial Times and Forbes that Yaccarino got bombarded all weekend by industry friends advising her to resign, or else face a "credibility crisis" as major brands—including Apple, Disney, IBM, Lionsgate, Paramount Global, Sony, and Warner Bros. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:12 pm
With deepest gratitude and excitement, Kent S. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:56 pm
In 1938, the Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the major studios at the time, also known as the Big Five (MGM, Paramount, RKO, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Brothers) and the Little Three (Universal, United Artists, and Columbia). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
Case backgroundAstellas alleged that sale of Teva's and Sandoz's generic mirabegron products would infringe Astella's formulation patent EP (UK) 2345410. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 7:15 am
The starting point for Mellor J’s analysis was Kitchin LJ’s judgment in Regeneron v Genentech [2013] EWCA Civ 93. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 8:39 am
Commenting on Meta’s alleged role in inciting violence and spreading misinformation, US Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) stated that Facebook lacked automated systems that could flag harmful posts in Amharic and Oromo, the languages spoken in Ethiopia, which were used to incite violence against ethnic minorities. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:22 pm
Warner, by Judge Irene Berger (S.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
AOL Time Warner, Inc., 261 F. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
Warner Bros. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:29 am
The AMPTP represents hundreds of studios and production companies, including Netflix, Universal Pictures, Disney, Paramount Pictures, and Warner Brothers. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
The English test was developed by the English Supreme Court in a case that concerned sufficiency rather than inventive step [the Warner-Lambert case – RL[3]]. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
Today’s adoption will promote greater transparency about short selling both to regulators and the public. [read post]