Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 221 - 240 of 11,673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by INFORRM
The event will be both in person – at Columbia University Davis Auditorium, 530 W 120th St, New York, NY, 10027 – and online. [read post]
The group had gone over 200 kilometres before arriving at Waitangi, where Rueben Tipari, the organizer, addressed the crowd, saying, “[w]e want our people to not just hīkoi together and then go home … back to our individual lives. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:25 am by Bobby Stroup
A quarter of a century after FSAs were introduced, President George W. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[W]hile those in opposition to the claimant's views could logically and cogently argue that antisemitism is why Zionism exists in the first place, it is not for the tribunal to inquire into the validity of either belief.... [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” In addition, in February 2023 Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief Counsel Ben W. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Namely, that his email's factual claims were false and that they were injurious to some individual. [read post]
According to SB 1012: California’s current approach to mental health has failed to fulfill its promise. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”  After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Then there’s the way that criminal law connects w/pleasure—what does the law do with the experience of pleasure? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
  We cannot vote for former presidents Barack Obama or George W. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Interference with alienability/resale—Molly Van Houweling’s work on interference w/numerus clausus, creation of servitudes. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Doesn’t totally deal w/Lanham Act 43(a) claims, but it’s notable that your precedents on the false advertising side are California consumer protection claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
Enacted in the wake of the Civil War, Section 3 was intended to disqualify individuals who had served in the federal (or state) government before the Civil War and had sworn to uphold the Constitution but then supported the Confederacy. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Gregg Hollander
This percentage varies for each person — one drink does not have the same impact on each individual. [read post]