Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 221 - 240
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 8:41 am
I'm looking forward to the Supreme Court's ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:07 am
DR v NCB – Nordisk Copyright Bureau (Case C-510/10); [2012] WLR (D) 127 “The exception in article 5(2)(d) of and Preamble 41 to Directive 2001/29 which permitted a broadcaster to use their own facilities or ‘those of a person acting on behalf of and under the responsibility of the broadcasting organisation’ to reproduce works by way of ephemeral recordings without the author’s consent, entitled a broadcaster to use a third party to… [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:21 am
Regina v A and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1622; [2010] WLR (D) 194 “Where a murder was committed by a number of defendants acting together recent authority did not establish that the secondary party’s foresight of the principal’s intention was never relevant. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Regina (SO) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (The Children’s Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 634 1101; [2010] WLR (D) 257 “Local authorities enjoyed, by virtue of s 23C(4)(c) of the Children Act 1989, the power to accommodate a person who had formerly been a child in care and was therefore a former ‘relevant child’ within s 23A of the Act, and a local authority was not entitled, when considering whether the welfare of… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
June 21, 2011, Minora, J.), Judge Carmen D. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:59 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:17 am
Regina v Y (A) [2010] EWCA Crim 762; [2010] WLR (D) 112 “Where a person possessed information likely to be useful to a terrorist within the meaning of s 58(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000, the fact that the possession was for the purpose of lawful self-defence which was solely defensive was capable of amounting to the statutory defence of reasonable excuse under s 58(3) of the 2000 Act, to an offence of possession under s 58(1). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
Newport City Council v Charles; [2008] WLR (D) 245 “A local authority's right to possession against a person succeeding to a tenancy on the death of a family member other than a spouse on the ground that the accommodation was more than he reasonably required was not an interest in land capable of giving rise to a proprietory estoppel against the tenant. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
R v Seddon; [2009] WLR (D) 88 “In a European arrest warrant which sought a defendant's return to this jurisdiction as a convicted person for the extradition offence of blackmail an allegation that the defendant was unlawfully at large and in breach of bail did not amount to ‘an offence disclosed by the information provided … [...] [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:48 pm
Brandeis School of Law, I will, from time to time, be contacted by someone wanting to know if we have anything relating to Harlan’s famous dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:36 pm
FISHER; ASHLI SLAWTER, d/b/a A. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 2:43 am
SEDLIK v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Vikram D. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:22 pm
The D. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:43 am
Leo Pharma A/S and another v Sandoz Ltd; [2010] EWHC 1911 (Pat); [2010] WLR (D) 214 “A sealed court order which had been drawn up and agreed by the parties at the request of the court could not be corrected under the slip rule contained in CPR 40.12(1) unless it had an unintended effect which was inconsistent with the intention of the court. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:25 am
Regina v S; Regina v H [2011] EWCA Crim 2872; [2011] WLR (D) 363 “Section 46 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 was not incompatible with articles 6 and 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by reason of being too vague and uncertain. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:56 am
Sinclair v Glatt and others [2009] EWCA Civ 176; [2009] WLR (D) 97 “A receiver appointed pursuant to s 77 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 to get in the assets of a convicted money launderer was entitled to recover his remuneration, costs and expenses from the realisable assets caught by the order. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:42 am
Protectacoat Firthglow Ltd v Szilagyi [2009] EWCA Civ 98; [2009] WLR (D) 67 “In determining whether a person who had carried out work for a company was its employee within the meaning of s 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the document purporting to retain the services of a person did not represent the [...] [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
LottoTron, Inc. v. [read post]
