Search for: "SCOTT v. US " Results 221 - 240 of 5,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 5:41 pm
On the other hand, Justice Stevens’ opinion in this case shares some themes with his solo dissents in Fourth Amendment qualified immunity cases like Scott v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But surely no origin story can be as unusual as that of Scott Bullock, the libertarian luminary who was born in, of all places, Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm by Joe Mullin
This week, a Scott Harris patent bites the bar-code dust, for now. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:09 pm
By Scott Hervey  Have you ever been into a used record store (remember those) and picked up a used CD that had the following language either on the CD case or on the CD itself: FOR PROMOTIONAL USE ONLY This CD is the property of the record company and is licensed to the intended recipient for personal use only. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:38 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
Laurence Clifford Scott v Icon Plastics Pty Ltd [2011] APO 84 (3 November 2011) Opposition – entitlement – whether the named inventor actually invented the subject matter of the application – whether the named applicant is an entitled person – filing of new application by entitled party A Hearing Officer (Delegate Ranganath Subbarayan) in the Australian Patent Office has invoked a rarely-used provision of the Patents Act 1990, which allows a true… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:07 pm
by Scott Hervey The rock band No Doubt had serious doubts about the way they were being portrayed in Activision’s video game Band Hero. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 3:20 pm by David Thomson
 And his suggestion of its use in a course combining discovery and products liability is a brilliant one. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:02 pm
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 6 October 2011 My partner, labor and employment lawyer Scott Brink, has informed us that the California Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in a high-profile labor law case, Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:54 pm by Adam Levitin
As for the constitutional argument, Scott notes that Justice Thomas's opinion in CFPB v. [read post]