Search for: "SEC v. Edwards" Results 221 - 240 of 291
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its chance of being granted.Title: Edwards v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
Under the terms of a 1972 lease agreement between Conquistador and the Jaffe Group, Conquistador was required to transfer to the Jaffe Group whatever right it had, if any, in the “Tropicana” name after the termination of the lease.Later, in 1977, the Jaffe Group formed a partnership with Edward and Fred Doumani (the “Doumanis”) named Tropicana Enterprises which succeeded the Jaffe Group as the lessor in the lease agreement with Conquistador. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:25 am by Broc Romanek
Third Circuit Rejects A "Fraud Created The Market" Theory for Presumption of Reliance As noted in this Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge memo, a ruling last week - Malack v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Criminal law attorney Terry Lenamon blog on his blog, Terry Lenamon on the Death Penalty What If You Filed A Lawsuit And Nobody Came: Comer v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm by David Cosgrove
Many investment advisers, such as SEC registered Investment Adviser Fisher Investments, use a boilerplate JAMS commercial arbitration clause in their Account Agreements (“LOA”) with customers that include a Delaware choice-of-law provision. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:05 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Civil Complaint for Investment Fraud - SEC v Goldman, Sachs & Co. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
Dental Ass’n, 139 F.3d 598 (1998) (en banc) (Tatel, J., dissenting) (along with Edwards, C.J., and Wald and Rogers, JJ., joining opinion arguing that intentional sex discrimination is sufficient to justify punitive damage award), rev’d, 527 U.S. 526 (1999). [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:02 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: SEC Complaint SEC Press Release – Litigation Release No. 21443 Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]