Search for: "STATE V. APPLE"
Results 221 - 240
of 4,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2013, 1:40 am
Last week Judge Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California) denied a couple of Samsung motions that would, if granted, have delayed the limited Apple v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac Foods Inc. is recalling apples shipped to 36 U.S. states for restaurants and grocery stores because of potential contamination from the bacterium Listeria. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
In his Microsoft v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 5:07 pm
The decision does not come as a big surprise, given the general trend followed by courts in the US post the epoch making decision in eBay v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:15 am
Apple smartphone design patent dispute will commence in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California with a retrial to determine a new award in the case. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
Apple v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 12:35 am
They relate to patents that Ericsson isn't asserting against Apple, at least not in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:30 am
" The case no. is 21 O 13504/20, and the court scheduled a hearing for May 12.VoiceAge EVS is also enforcing patents in the United States, such as against Xiaomi. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 1:46 pm
Based on current schedules, there will be two Apple v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
In Apple v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:03 am
Apple says that damages-only retrials, such as in Uniloc v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm
I observed the same in Oracle v. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
Also, there'll be an Ericsson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:23 am
Judge Koh, however, had allowed a renewed motion for a stay only in a situation in which Apple's only option left would be a notice of appeal.Samsung's notice of Apple's appeal says that "Apple did not take any of the actions Apple described other than filing a Notice of Appeal, because it could not have meaningfully taken such actions, precisely as Samsung stated". [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:39 am
Taxi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 7:23 pm
Fischel's The Law and Economics of Cedar-Apple Rust: State Action and Just Compensation in Miller v. [read post]
