Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE" Results 221 - 240 of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 6:34 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Roseville decision, the Ninth Circuit held that Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd.: Greater Research Protection for Drug Manufacturers, DJCLPP:See Lawrence Ebert, One Response to Merck v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:36 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Here is a Topeka Capital-Journal article reporting that John Kerns won an acquittal in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 10:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Gottlieb v Incorporated Village of Lawrence, 2015 WL 4634590 (NYAD 2 Dept. 8/5/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Variances [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 4:03 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke v R [2012] EWCA Crim 9 (20 January 2012) Oliver, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3114 (21 December 2011) Lawrence, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 3129 (16 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civi Division) Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc & Ors v HM Revenue & Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 15 (20 January 2012) Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 14 (20 January 2012) Charnock & Ors v… [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 446 (07 June 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Considine, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 1166 (06 June 2007) Green, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 1248 (25 May 2007) Stephens & Anor, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 1249 (25 May 2007) High Court (Administrative Court) British Casino Association Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v British Amusment Catering… [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Arah (Bowie State University) reviews FLAGRANT CONDUCT: THE STORY OF LAWRENCE v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:47 pm
Yost also has this report on yesterday's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:25 am by Michael L. Saile, Jr., Esq.
The Superior Court ruled against the Mercer County NJ prosecutor by stating that the 20-minute observation rule was required by State v. [read post]