Search for: "STATE v. SALES"
Results 221 - 240
of 21,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2021, 4:43 am
Ranalli v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:43 am
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by defense — Call for jury to draw unfavorable inference This matter comes to this Court on appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, where appellant Dexter Moody was indicted on charges stemming from a suspected sale of narcotics in an area just south of Clifton Park. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:27 pm
There were two victims – Kristopher Odle, who drove to the scene to arrange a sale of marijuana ... [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 7:41 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Induced statement After a rendezvous for a planned sale of narcotics led to the fatal shooting of the putative buyer, Diare Caldwell, appellant, was indicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County and charged with first degree and second degree murder, armed robbery, conspiracy with Darin ... [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:23 pm
In Colter v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Loeffler v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
Entertainment Merchants Ass'n, which was the State of California's last great attempt to reinstate its ban on the sale of violent video games to minors. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
The suit, California v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:53 am
Concrete Prods. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
In the United States, the inventor also gets a one-year grace period before the on-sale bar applies. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 12:43 pm
In the United States, the inventor also gets a one-year grace period before the on-sale bar applies. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 7:00 am
Penny Company, Inc .v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
On January 12, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inOneok, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:16 pm
Quill Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm
In a highly anticipated decision under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the United States Supreme Court handed down a big win on Tuesday for the pharmaceutical industry when the Court found pharmaceutical sales representatives are covered by the outside sales exemption in Christopher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm
In a release dated July 11, State Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger indicated that the sellers will be required to collect beginning on October 1, 2018 after the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:46 am
” On June 13, 2018, the Ohio Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case, Cincinnati Reds, LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:01 am
Facts: This case (Craig v. [read post]
