Search for: "STATE v. WANG" Results 221 - 240 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
We also note the treatment by the Canadian Trademark Opposition Board, confirmed on Appeal (see, for example, Cheung's Bakery Products Ltd v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm by ernst
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:08 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in KSR v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies relevant… [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm by Ronald Mann
Arguing for Liu and Wang, Gregory Rapawy’s first point relied on a Supreme Court decision three years ago, Kokesh v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 7:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Cert Petition In May 2019, Liu and Wang filed a petition to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm by almaraz
Walter Wang Challenging State Taxation of Renewable Energy: Will Wyoming Be The Battleground? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Jimmy Chalk, Sarah Grant
The United States intervened, Lorenzana said, and was able to dissuade the Chinese from crossing what would be a “red line” for both the Philippines and the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Big Data Regulatory Debates in the EU Wang, F. [read post]