Search for: "STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE" Results 221 - 240 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
 This footnote strikes us as frankly bizarre. [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP)   Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt)     Events… [read post]
The First District Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the Project, pursuant to SB 35 was eligible for ministerial review and approval, and to do so does not violate the City’s charter authority. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:24 pm by Jay
For example, under Michigan Law “LLCs are not corporations. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:54 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Matter of Riera v Ayabaca, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2025 WL 395851, 2025 N.Y. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:55 am by Beth Graham
AnimalFeeds International Corp. and Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Cooper, 16-166 Issues: (1) Whether the district court erred in holding that a lack of discernible standards prevented it from striking down as a partisan gerrymander a districting plan when the plan’s architect freely admitted it was a partisan gerrymander designed to elect as many Republicans as mathematically possible; (2) whether the district court erred in holding that it could not, on the record before it, strike down a districting plan under the 14th… [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Rodriguez, 15-1204, involves a government challenge to lower court decisions holding that certain detained aliens are entitled to bond hearings. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 326 (1992) (“employ” is defined with “striking breadth”). [read post]