Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S."
Results 221 - 240
of 6,053
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
” Cases applying Partnership Law § 20 (c) (3) hold that sale of a single real estate asset owned by a general partnership would make it impossible to carry on the business of the partnership, causes the partnership’s dissolution by operation of law, and therefore, requires unanimity, lack of which renders the attempted sale “null and void” (Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio, LLC, 164 AD3d 739 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court case (South Dakota v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 8:48 am
The judges referred to the CJEU decision in Parfums Christian Dior v Evora (C-337/95), which found that damage to the reputation of a trade mark can be a legitimate reason within the meaning of the provision. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 8:53 am
Motives irrelevant (5) For the purposes of this section, the motives of an accused are irrelevant. (6) [Repealed, 1993, c. 46, s. 1] (7) [Repealed, 2018, c. 29, s. 11] Obscene publication (8) For the purposes of this Act, any publication a dominant characteristic of which is the undue exploitation of sex, or of sex and any one or more of the following subjects, namely, crime, horror, cruelty and violence, shall be deemed to be obscene. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:19 am
Campbell v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Court considered the employee’s work situation following the sale of the business, noting that she was not asked to submit a resume or interviewed. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Court considered the employee’s work situation following the sale of the business, noting that she was not asked to submit a resume or interviewed. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:50 am
Gunaratna v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
This is the final part of this Kat’s analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm
From Judge Timothy Brooks' opinion yesterday in Netchoice, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:05 am
§ 922(a), (b), (o), (v), & (w) Description It is unlawful to knowingly possess or manufacture certain types of firearms. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
Nautica Apparel, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:03 am
Other options include Engel & Völkers, HomeEspaña, and SBD Immobles. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
Prang & Co, C. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:01 am
For such egregious breaches, MOM may seek a civil penalty against the company and the decision-maker(s) in Court, and curtail the company’s work pass privileges. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
Mr Justice Jay agreed with the Lower Court that Canada Square’s breach of duty was deliberate for the period between ss 140A-C CCA 1974 coming into force on 6 April 2007 and the end of the loan in March 2010. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
She claims she generated $10k/week in sales. [read post]
